Cleared the same day where we can. On the older houses we put a camera down first, because the drainage here was added long after the walls and it goes where it could, not where you would expect.
Online Now!·--:--
Burwood's older houses are older than Sydney's sewer. The network reached around 25,000 inner-city properties by 1889 and spread outward from there, while The Priory on Burwood Road went up in 1877 and Gayton in 1888.
So these homes were built with a cesspit in the yard and nothing to connect to. The drainage arrived later and had to be worked into a building that was already standing, which means it runs wherever it could rather than wherever it should.
Then it was added to. A bathroom in the 1920s, another in the 1960s, an extension in the 1990s, each tied into whatever the previous person had left. Nobody wrote any of it down.
Which is why we film before forming an opinion. Not as an upsell, but because the alternative is opening ground on an assumption, and on a heritage block that is an expensive way to find out you were wrong.


Ask them where the drain runs and how they know. On a house this age there is only one honest way to answer that.
Sydney's network reached roughly 25,000 inner-city properties by 1889 and expanded outward. Burwood's landmark houses date from 1877 and 1888.
They were built around a cesspit, not around a drain. There was simply nothing to connect them to at the time.
Retrofitting into finished masonry means taking whatever route was physically possible, not the sensible one.
Around the outside, under a later addition, through a lightwell, doubling back on itself. It looks irrational and it was entirely rational at the time.
A bathroom in one decade, another in the next, a kitchen extension later again, each tied into whatever the last person left behind.
The result is several eras of pipework and workmanship in one line, joined at points that were never recorded.
Changes of material, diameter or fall all happen at those junctions, and a slight step is enough to catch everything passing.
Which is why a recurring blockage in the same spot is usually a defect rather than a habit, and the footage shows which.
It is the only way anyone establishes where the line actually goes, and it costs a fraction of excavating in the wrong place.
We mark the route on the surface afterwards. Keep it. The next tradesman will be starting from exactly where you are now.
Agreed in writing before anyone starts. These are indicative 2026 ranges. On a house of this age the camera line is the one we would spend money on first.
Through an existing access point, cleared and flow tested before we leave.
Where the line actually goes, filmed and marked on the surface. Yours to keep.
Roots and hardened build-up in aged pipework take longer than a soft blockage.
Pinpointed and marked, so any repair opens one small area rather than a search.
What we found, where it runs, and whether clearing will actually hold.

It decides whether this is a straightforward clear or a line nobody has ever mapped.

Through the existing access point, then run properly to confirm it is genuinely clear rather than just moving.

The camera goes down and we follow the run, because on these houses that is the only way to know where it goes.

Marked on the surface and written down, so you own the information rather than paying to rediscover it.
We will get it running today. And on an older house we will find out where it actually goes while we are there, rather than leaving that for next time.
Call 1300 381 569
Because it was never designed into the house. Burwood's older homes were built before the sewer reached them, with a cesspit in the yard and nothing to connect to. The drainage came years later and had to be threaded around a building that was already finished, so it runs wherever it physically could: around the outside, under a later addition, through a lightwell, doubling back rather than taking the obvious line. It is not bad workmanship. It is what retrofitting into solid masonry looks like.
On a modern house we would often tell you it is not needed for a first blockage. On a Victorian one it is the opposite: it is the cheapest thing you can do. Nobody holds a plan of your drainage, including us, so the alternative to twenty minutes of footage is somebody excavating on an assumption. Digging in the wrong place on a large heritage block costs several times what the camera does, and you still have to do it again in the right place.
Honestly, no, and anyone who says they can has not looked. We can tell you where drainage usually runs in houses of this era, which is a starting point rather than an answer. What we can do is put a camera down, follow it, and mark the route on the surface so you have it for good. That mark is worth keeping, because the next tradesman will have exactly the same problem you have now.
Frequently because that spot is one of the junctions where somebody tied a later addition into the original retrofitted line. Those junctions were made at different dates by different hands in different materials, and they are where a line loses fall, changes diameter, or has a slight step that catches everything passing. Clearing it repeatedly treats the symptom. The footage shows whether it is a defect worth sealing.
No. They clear the bowl, which is all the label really promises, then fail to break down the way paper does. In a line with old junctions and imperfect fall they snag at the first irregularity and build from there, which is why the same house can cope for years and then block monthly once the habit starts.
Rarely, and on pipework this old they do damage. They sit against the blockage rather than passing through, they generate heat, and in aged earthenware and cast iron they attack the pipe about as enthusiastically as the obstruction. If somebody has already poured one down, please tell us when you ring rather than once we have the line open.
A standard clear through an existing access point is $150 to $400. A camera inspection with the route marked on the surface is $250 to $450, and on a house of this age that is the single most useful money you will spend. A jetter on a stubborn line is $400 to $700. We agree the figure in writing before starting.
Tell us roughly how old the house is and whether anyone has ever filmed the drain. Those two answers decide what we bring and how long it takes.
Fixed price agreed first, the run filmed and marked, and an honest view on whether clearing will hold.
Online Now!·--:--